http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/ [Disclaimer: The comments posted on this site express only the views of the commentators and not necessarily those of ads2blog.com team] Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:07:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-13210 Kre8tive Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:09:22 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-13210 whatever Panks, enough of your mumbo jumbos, but still you could've done better than this first thought. whatever Panks, enough of your mumbo jumbos, but still you could've done better than this first thought.

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12975 panks Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:40:17 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12975 first of all these ads are not spoof of particular ad. The though/idea is in each line. and since AdEaters is collection of ads around the world, we decided to use famous templates. if u have creative jinx, you will be able to understand the fun side of it. anyways i know few people will always be negative about everything. first of all these ads are not spoof of particular ad. The though/idea is in each line. and since AdEaters is collection of ads around the world, we decided to use famous templates. if u have creative jinx, you will be able to understand the fun side of it. anyways i know few people will always be negative about everything.

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12817 kre8tive Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:48:46 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12817 lol. lol.

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12794 Mark Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:02:51 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12794 oops i noticed i spelt copywriter copyrighter oops i noticed i spelt copywriter copyrighter

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12772 Moey Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:35:03 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12772 Its not bad =) Its not bad =)

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12765 kre8tive Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:59:14 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12765 Panks, are you Louai in disguise? Panks, are you Louai in disguise?

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12745 just me Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:30:18 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12745 BTW, the ads in press were almost all Impact/BBDO clients... such a shame!!! BTW, the ads in press were almost all Impact/BBDO clients… such a shame!!!

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12743 kre8tive Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:04:32 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12743 Come on, Panks... these ads are "FIRST THOUGHT"... Also, gaining mileage from famous ads/templates? That's too cheap and raped for centuries... Think harder and be original, shame on you and I feel sorry for ADEATERS. Come on, Panks… these ads are "FIRST THOUGHT"… Also, gaining mileage from famous ads/templates? That's too cheap and raped for centuries… Think harder and be original, shame on you and I feel sorry for ADEATERS.

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12741 panks Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:00:48 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12741 bADEATERS was KRE8TIVE :) bADEATERS was KRE8TIVE :)

]]> http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/comment-page-1/#comment-12740 Mark Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:56:30 +0000 http://www.ads2blog.com/2008/02/02/the-night-of-the-adeaters/#comment-12740 I am no copyrighter but wouldn't "Imagine paying for watching commercials" be better as "Imagine paying to watch commercials"? I am no copyrighter but wouldn't "Imagine paying for watching commercials" be better as "Imagine paying to watch commercials"?

]]>